| 000 | 02665nam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20250318151954.0 | ||
| 008 | 250318b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | _cUAS Dharwad | ||
| 041 | _aEnglish | ||
| 082 |
_a634.9 _bNAY |
||
| 100 | _aNayana G S | ||
| 245 | _aEvaluation of Performance of Village Forest Committees in Sirsi Forest Division of Karnataka Under Joint Forest Planning and Management | ||
| 250 | _aM Sc (Agri) | ||
| 260 |
_aDharwad _bUniversity of Agricultural Sciences _c2024 |
||
| 300 |
_a112 _c32 Cms |
||
| 520 | _aABSTRACT Joint Forest Planning and Management (JFPM) approach is the collaboration of Forest Department and Village Community for regeneration, conservation, protection and sustainable use of forest resources. The present study investigated the impact and effectiveness of Village Forest Committees (VFCs) in managing forest resources and improving livelihoods in six ranges of Sirsi Forest Division. The research focused on benefit-sharing patterns, asset creation and socio-economic outcomes. Data was collected through semi- structured questionnaires and secondary sources and analysed using statistical methods. VFCs received a significant share of benefits, especially from Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) and Acacia plantations. However, a decline in NTFP collection was noted. Assets created by utilizing the benefits were categorised into physical, social, human, financial and natural assets. The performance of VFCs was better where more physical assets were created. Financial assets were enhanced through microfinancing, although only 18.62 per cent of respondents benefited from these schemes. The performance of VFCs was found to vary, with better outcomes linked to the creation of physical assets. The study also highlighted the socio-economic profiles of VFC members, revealing a predominance of marginal farmers with low income and a reliance on agriculture. The study concluded that JFM had significantly improved livelihood conditions in the area, with 62.75 per cent of respondents reporting a medium livelihood status post-JFM implementation. However, inconsistencies in VFC performance and asset distribution highlight areas for improvement. While JFPM had improved livelihood and standards of living, especially through enhanced employment, microfinancing and training programmes, the study highlighted the need for consistent performance across VFCs to ensure the continued success of JFM in promoting sustainable forest management and socio-economic development. | ||
| 650 | _aSilviculture and Agroforestry | ||
| 942 |
_cTH _eM Sc (Agri) _h634.9 _kNAY _n0 _6634_900000000000000 |
||
| 999 |
_c70939 _d70939 |
||